Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:20:03 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/evolution-data-server/files patch-addressbook_backends_groupwise_e-book-backend-groupwise.c patch-addressbook_backends_ldap_e-book-backend-ldap.c patch-calendar_backends_groupwise_e-cal-backend-groupwise.c patch-camel-groupwise-folder.c patch-camel-groupwise-utils.c patch-libedataserverui_e-name-selector-entry.c patch-servers-exchange-storage-e-folder-exchange.c patch-servers-groupwise-e-gw-connection.c patch-servers-groupwise-e-gw-item.c Message-ID: <1131664803.49877.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1131643639.12281.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200511100939.jAA9dFMe065113@repoman.freebsd.org> <1131643639.12281.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-XhpmJ54m6ytsd+vWnmtc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Joe Marcus Clarke p=ED=B9e v =E8t 10. 11. 2005 v 12:27 -0500:
> On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 09:39 +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > pav 2005-11-10 09:39:15 UTC
> >=20
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >=20
> > Modified files:
> > databases/evolution-data-server/files=20
> > patch-addressbook_backends_ld=
ap_e-book-backend-ldap.c=20
> > Added files:
> > databases/evolution-data-server/files=20
> > patch-addressbook_backends_gr=
oupwise_e-book-backend-groupwise.c=20
> > patch-calendar_backends_group=
wise_e-cal-backend-groupwise.c=20
> > patch-camel-groupwise-folder.=
c=20
> > patch-camel-groupwise-utils.c=
=20
> > patch-libedataserverui_e-name=
-selector-entry.c=20
> > patch-servers-exchange-storag=
e-e-folder-exchange.c=20
> > patch-servers-groupwise-e-gw-=
connection.c=20
> > patch-servers-groupwise-e-gw-=
item.c=20
> > Log:
> > - Fix build on 4.X
>=20
> I didn't want to do this. It's clear the Evo people don't want these
> patches, and it will be too difficult to maintain them from version to
> version. We don't support Evo on 4.X anymore, and these patches should
> be dropped.
I needed this for a new port that used pygnomeextras. This was a single
port I needed to fix. Does this mean that committers are free to stop
testing ports on 4.X?
If the patches do not apply after the next release, you're free to just
delete them.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Mischief managed.
--=-XhpmJ54m6ytsd+vWnmtc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDc9WjntdYP8FOsoIRAnQjAKCfK22WQ5+IHwmNuQ839OHZi4jVWgCfXtnS
0+ToKIWNpavEOn12m/rfdkg=
=LjcQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-XhpmJ54m6ytsd+vWnmtc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1131664803.49877.2.camel>