From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Mar 4 7:43: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from loki.intrepid.net (intrepid.net [204.71.127.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DF51504E for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:42:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@loki.intrepid.net) Received: (from mark@localhost) by loki.intrepid.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA16057; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:42:23 -0500 Message-ID: <19990304104223.G29262@intrepid.net> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:42:23 -0500 From: Mark Conway Wirt To: Stuart Henderson , admin@wholesalehosting.com Cc: "freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Sednmail 8.9.3 'trusted relaying' References: <36DE304C28A.AF82ADMIN@domains.md> <36DE590E.B2691B23@eclipse.net.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2 In-Reply-To: <36DE590E.B2691B23@eclipse.net.uk>; from Stuart Henderson on Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 09:57:34AM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 09:57:34AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I want this odd method so that a client on my box can relay > > from their windows pop mail programs through their business > > domains which are aliased to their user accounts. > > Look for one of the user-must-authenticate-by-POP3-before-relaying > hacks. That's problematical, because some mailers (either IE or netscape for example -- I can't remember which) are set up the opposite; they are hard-wired to send before receiving, and it's alway a problem to tell your customers "no, you can't use your favorite mailer with us." --Mark -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message