From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 19 13:19:13 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054C816A41F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:19:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E73B43D48
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:19:12 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: (qmail 24915 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2005 13:19:12 -0000
Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org)
	([66.92.78.145])
	(envelope-sender <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>)
	by mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; 19 Oct 2005 13:19:12 -0000
Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id 26B3A3F; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:19:11 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org
To: Rem P Roberti <remegius@comcast.net>
References: <435558E2.1040900@comcast.net> <44sluyr20j.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
	<4355610E.3050903@comcast.net>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Date: 19 Oct 2005 09:19:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4355610E.3050903@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <44sluxy78w.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 33
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Portversion question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:19:13 -0000

Rem P Roberti <remegius@comcast.net> writes:

> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> 
> >Rem P Roberti <remegius@comcast.net> writes:
> >
> >
> >>I have crontab run cvsup, and make a new port index for me nightly.
> >>This morning I ran portversion -l and found that there was a package
> >>it regarded as not being up to date.  However, neither portmanager or
> >>portupgrade picked up the non-current package.  Why would portversion
> >>indicate a package that is not up to date, and either of the two
> >>upgrade programs not find it also?
> >>
> >
> >A bug?
> >A port that was moved? [see /usr/ports/MOVED]
> >
> >There are probably other possible reasons, but you didn't give us much
> >to go on...
> >
> >
> The port in question is libmng, which is in the graphics directory.
> The current version is 1.0.8, and that is exactly what pkg_info shows
> as being installed.  Portversion continues to show it as out of date.
> I have no doubt that my newbieness is missing something here, and I'd
> love to find out what it is :)

Pretty puzzling, actually, but seeing the exact output would help a
lot.  On the other hand, the libmng port is now up to 1.0.9...
-- 
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
		http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/