Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 20:02:29 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel w/o source? [MOD_DECL in lkm.h] Message-ID: <199701070302.UAA13658@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <26021.852374224@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 4, 97 02:37:04 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > place. If the next WC CD came out with a minimal generic kernel > > (that was enough to get console & disk working) and everything > > else as lkms, then I would most likely _never_ build a kernel > > because my development work is done in user-space (except for > > Yes, we like it! We'll take it! Go John go! Rah rah rah! :-) John would continue to have to build kernels so long as the proc structure size and layout kept changing, and so long as ps and the rest kept their historical "run against a file" capabilities instead of using /proc like they should... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701070302.UAA13658>