Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 14:46:26 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> Cc: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker), ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <199703022246.OAA07379@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 17:36:04 EST." <199703022236.RAA01021@crh.cl.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Which brings the interesting point since gcc in 3.0-current is inefficient should we also recompile msun on a 2.1 system for PPRO systems? Who knows we may be able to break the 400k keys/sec before the end of the day 8) Amancio >From The Desk Of Charles Henrich : > > On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Charles Henrich wrote: > > > > > Hmm the one amancio put up seems like the old one. Try the one at > > > ftp.scnc.k12.mi.us/pub/misc/rc5-56-freebsd > > > > > Same results, but you mentioned something about new math libs? > > I'm running 3.0-current over here (well, current as far as before all > > the lite2 instabilities)... > > You need to rebuild /usr/lib/msun after editing /etc/make.conf to enable > HAVE_FPU > > -Crh > > Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu > > http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703022246.OAA07379>