Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:18:45 +0000 From: Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org> To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r347886 - in head/www: . py-django-pipeline12 Message-ID: <20140311151845.GC39855@mouf.net> In-Reply-To: <531F2490.20505@yandex.ru> References: <201403111453.s2BEruMv033474@svn.freebsd.org> <531F2490.20505@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 06:58:24PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > why portepoch in new port? I think that was just a mistake on my part. Maybe I was thinking it was necessary, but it shouldn't be, before I added the PKGNAMESUFFIX or something. Of course, with portepoch, you can never remove it. Good news is this port shouldn't be needed for too long. It's needed for reviewboard 1.x but not 2.x. I'm working on updating it to the latest 1.7.22 right now, but 2.0 will be out soon. Once we update the port to 2.0, we can probably remove this port. > Any reason to not use PYDISTUTILS_AUTOPLIST? Didn't know about it. I'm not a big python port user. I'll take a look. > And if pkg-plist is there for reason, why not to use > %%PYTHON_SITELIBDIR%% instead of %%PYTHON_LIBDIR%%/site-packages? It's just what poudriere suggested, sorry. Again, I'm not that experienced with python ports, but I'm picking it up. :) Thanks for the suggestions. Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140311151845.GC39855>