Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:24:09 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, sf@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86 4.1.0 and include/GL/glu.h Message-ID: <20010608132409.Z3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B21155D.D03BEBE5@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:11:42PM %2B0300 References: <20010608122321.W3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <3B210DE6.E938A4B4@FreeBSD.org> <20010608124901.X3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <3B21155D.D03BEBE5@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:11:42PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG) wrote:
> Yes, this could be a way to go. Actually I'm already thinking about something like that,
> but have not came to the final conclusion yet.
Any reason not to do it that way? If we do it this way, we can
include full GLUT support for XFree86 4.x in *packages*, not just
ports, WITHOUT breaking it for XFree86 3.x. :-)
> Yes, this is not a good idea, because libGL from XFree86 is different from those from
> Mesa3 (dri, glx etc), so it would be a Great Pain in Ass[tm] to do and maintain
> properly.
I *REALLY* *HATE* forks!!!!!!!!!!
--
wca
P.S. I'm >< close to swearing in my public email, and then going
and redoing the whole XFree86-4{,-*} system myself.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010608132409.Z3278>