From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 8 11:24:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from london.physics.purdue.edu (london.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.67.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE64637B406; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:24:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@physics.purdue.edu) Received: from bohr.physics.purdue.edu (bohr.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.67.12]) by london.physics.purdue.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA18441; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:24:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by bohr.physics.purdue.edu (Postfix, from userid 12409) id 245F65BA9; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:24:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:24:09 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: Will Andrews , FreeBSD Ports , jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, sf@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86 4.1.0 and include/GL/glu.h Message-ID: <20010608132409.Z3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Maxim Sobolev , Will Andrews , FreeBSD Ports , jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, sf@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010608122321.W3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <3B210DE6.E938A4B4@FreeBSD.org> <20010608124901.X3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <3B21155D.D03BEBE5@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <3B21155D.D03BEBE5@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:11:42PM +0300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:11:42PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG) wrote: > Yes, this could be a way to go. Actually I'm already thinking about something like that, > but have not came to the final conclusion yet. Any reason not to do it that way? If we do it this way, we can include full GLUT support for XFree86 4.x in *packages*, not just ports, WITHOUT breaking it for XFree86 3.x. :-) > Yes, this is not a good idea, because libGL from XFree86 is different from those from > Mesa3 (dri, glx etc), so it would be a Great Pain in Ass[tm] to do and maintain > properly. I *REALLY* *HATE* forks!!!!!!!!!! -- wca P.S. I'm >< close to swearing in my public email, and then going and redoing the whole XFree86-4{,-*} system myself. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message