From owner-cvs-all Fri Apr 20 1:40:48 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from tele-post-20.mail.demon.net (tele-post-20.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC6237B422; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 01:40:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from [62.49.251.130] (helo=herring.nlsystems.com) by tele-post-20.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 14qWT5-000Hae-0K; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 08:40:44 +0000 Received: from salmon.nlsystems.com (salmon [10.0.0.3]) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f3K8dS795503; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:39:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:39:28 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: "David O'Brien" Cc: John Baldwin , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ia64/ia64 vm_machdep.c In-Reply-To: <20010419140733.C72450@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:44:36AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > Very, very cool! Now it's time to get signal handling working. :) It would > > also be nice if we could get an updated toolchain so we don't need the ELFABI > > hack as well. > > Me is vary scared how much the existing IA-64 code will break with GCC > 3.0 + Binutils 2.11.0. I think that the only thing which will actually break is the DDB stack trace code I wrote the other day. That needs to be redone to use the unwind records laid down by the compiler. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message