From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Apr  7 20:29:16 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B15D15223
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  7 Apr 1999 20:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA03975;
	Thu, 8 Apr 1999 13:27:12 +1000
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 13:27:12 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199904080327.NAA03975@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, jdp@polstra.com
Subject: Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>> Everything should be buildable with CC=aac (any ANSI compiler), but
>> that's asking too much for programs like kernels and boot blocks.
>
>The problem in this case is just that the compilers require
>different command line options.  It's asking _way_ too much to
>require those to be identical.

Actually, they don't.  Compiler-specific options can be put in ${CC}.
Perhaps they even should be.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message