From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 19 08:27:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A1A106566B; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DD98FC21; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A568B4.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.104.180]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8432E0D7; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:27:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20CD8C25C; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:26:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1205915210; bh=9LmfKYuyFrCMjMZkS/S6bA5J5fm4mF8hk RN19+h6M8s=; h=Message-ID:X-Priority:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:Content-Transfer-Encoding:User-Agent; b=oB6bGu PFufHBLsB4EItNcZmKeQHkcEhe87MiM+kVLPt/yf9ZSxstff0J3EgUeBR+OULLv3Q0Z T83aPt5oWkUkQMfSu4Msj4Ev1F7XF1wpDXrtp6YjaQDirc0iImLMUdpYqB6nU2qOhbN XaMB4r7g7V81iWynCi5axvDmr7d4UAdkJ0wLicj2XwoRHIRS/kdWy9gIm3+SGKPmg+N Imi6JA6oJQ2m72JwoEM5B0WiBAcK8sx4QPiY7qnbmMYQ9Hqhq/ot5QQatDOZlcOtgVX bsIZgTW441mBzH/K6/qojPLQJgoRbjEmGpy9ZNcX9PyAiv7GUmJO8OxBOlOlUtM0oBI w== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id m2J8QnfC009254; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:26:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:26:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20080319092649.9nz559g1csgk8sks@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:26:49 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Robert Watson References: <200803180001.m2I0198Z041189@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080318182410.sbd7kgo52c84gogc@webmail.leidinger.net> <20080318173436.Y34016@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20080318173436.Y34016@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.5) / FreeBSD-8.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.9, required 6, BAYES_00 -15.00, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/ideas ideas.xml ideas.xsl X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:27:48 -0000 Quoting Robert Watson (from Tue, 18 Mar 2008 =20 17:37:26 +0000 (GMT)): > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> This is missing an explanation what the tags mean. A student may =20 >> get confused by this. What does it mean that the soc2007 ones are =20 >> tagged like they are? For a lot of them I don't see changes in p4. =20 >> Are there projects where a follow up in the SoC 2008 could be =20 >> beneficial? What are the outstanding issues? > > What I basically did is take ideas for whom a significant amount of > work was done towards the goal as part of GSoC 2007 and mark them as > soc-2007 instead of soc on the basis that we weren't immediately clear > if they were "free" to be done this year. I've contacted a few of the Currently (when a student looks at the ideas page) it is not clear =20 what the 2007 label means. Removing the 2007 marker would be better. =20 Why do we need to keep it merked as a previous SoC entry? With the =20 2008 markers we explicitly tell that those items are encouraged to =20 take for the SoC. This means items without the marker are not =20 encouraged to take for the SoC. A part of the 2007 items has a WIP =20 link, and the rest has at least a technical contact. As such I propose =20 to our soc organizers (you and Murray, as both of you commit to the =20 ideas list), to remove the 2007 markers, as this would be less =20 confusing for the students and would give the same hint to not take =20 this (the good students will contact the technical contact before the =20 application anyway). Bye, Alexander. --=20 If you have seen one city slum you have seen them all. =09=09-- Spiro Agnew http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137