From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 23 06:20:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9F710656A5; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FAF8FC0C; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA11445; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:20:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1OnQOa-000DnA-KR; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:20:36 +0300 Message-ID: <4C721334.1050000@icyb.net.ua> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:20:36 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100822 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4C71E858.90009@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C71E858.90009@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: runaway intr problems: powerd and/or hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest related X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:20:39 -0000 on 23/08/2010 06:17 Doug Barton said the following: > I also got another interesting set of data today from a "runaway intr" situation > that did not involve swi:4. The symptoms were the same as previously, but the > devices involved were totally different. This may have to do with the fact that > I switched back to ULE for the testing today, and/or I hadn't set cx_lowest=C3. Yes, ULE rules. 4BSD usually only makes things better when there is some real problem and 4BSD masks it due to its design. > http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/intr-out-3.txt So, hm, npviewer.bin eats all the CPU time? Just google that name and see that you are not alone. Can't help with that though. > This was with ULE + USB in the kernel, LAPIC/HPET, cx_lowest=C1, but running > powerd with the following: > powerd_flags="-a adaptive -b adaptive -n adaptive" -- Andriy Gapon