Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 07:47:16 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: John Von Essen <john@quonix.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Bind, DNS, and Denial of Service Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1412030742470.84718@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <005d01d00ead$00d56320$02802960$@quonix.net> References: <002e01d00e8c$1b7d6f40$52784dc0$@quonix.net> <381c25e1046453b9f7a5c94809e7d7fb@ultimatedns.net> <004e01d00ea0$6b7c7860$42756920$@quonix.net> <547E82CC.3040007@egr.msu.edu> <005d01d00ead$00d56320$02802960$@quonix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, John Von Essen wrote: > The base bind99 port did not behave nicely even when I set > named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named" because the port is built with a > sysconfdir of /usr/local/etc which through everything out of whack. Even > when I tried to override the startup scrip to explicitly pass -c /etc/namedb > things were all weird. Rndc also didn't work because it kept looking in the > wrong dir's, etc.,. The port used to have an option to overwrite the base BIND. There is an example of installing dns/bind99 in a 10.X jail in the Handbook: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-ezjail.html#jails-ezjail-example-bind
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1412030742470.84718>