Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:42:48 -0600 From: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> To: Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, khatfield@socllc.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD boxes as a 'router'... Message-ID: <E1F4816E-676C-4630-9FA1-817F737D007D@netgate.com> In-Reply-To: <1353448328.76219.YahooMailClassic@web121602.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1353448328.76219.YahooMailClassic@web121602.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 20, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com> = wrote: > Anyone who even mentions polling should be discounted altogether. = Polling > had value when you couldn't control the interrupt delays; but = interrupt > moderation allows you to pace the interrupts any way you like without > the inefficiencies of polling. You're entitled to your opinion, but experimental results have tended to = show yours incorrect. Jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1F4816E-676C-4630-9FA1-817F737D007D>