Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:42:25 -0600
From:      "Gene" <fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kalle_M=F8ller_?=<freebsd-questions@k-moeller.dk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Portsnap vs CSup
Message-ID:  <20090319234025.M71484@brightstar.bomgardner.net>
In-Reply-To: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:39:37 +0100, Kalle Møller wrote
> Hi
> 
> I've been digging around, but I can't find a clear answer, which of those
> two is the "correct" to use. Hence I don't use one now, so if I'm 
> going to learn one, I would prefer it to be the right one.
> 
> -- 
> /km
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

`As a veteran of both csup and portsnap, I can say that either does the job 
admirably. The main difference I've found is that portsnap seems to be 
faster.

Go with your own preferences.

IHN,
Gene


--
To everything there is a season,
And a time to every purpose under heaven.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090319234025.M71484>