From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 16:44:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBC9106564A; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96298FC16; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696903910B; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:44:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) id C58D110059; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:44:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E8A10054; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:44:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:44:13 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: QAT@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20090207160151.829C78FC71@release.ixsystems.com> Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: <200902071511.n17FBVqH073928@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090207160151.829C78FC71@release.ixsystems.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.99 (LSU 1142 2008-08-13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/science/mbdyn Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:44:12 -0000 On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, QAT@FreeBSD.org wrote: > y12wrap.cc: In member function 'void Y12Solver::Factor()': > y12wrap.cc:174: error: 'memmove' was not declared in this scope > gmake[2]: *** [y12wrap.lo] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/work/a/ports/science/mbdyn/work/mbdyn-1.2.7/libraries/libmbwrap' Good catch, my bad: I had failed to mark this BROKEN. (For the record, the breakage has not been introduced by the patch of mine that triggered the QAT run, and while not an expert in this port I wanted to contribute at least what I could to make the lives of others looking at it easier.) We really shouldn't have so many ports without a real maintainer properly taking care. The amount of bitrot in the tree is worrisome (and that is despite the great work of portmgrs and others like miwi who got us rid of long term BROKENess last week). Gerald