Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:46:42 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, Amit Shah <amitshah@techie.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: threaded device drivers Message-ID: <20010818224642.A14857@caldera.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108181321520.59594-100000@beppo>; from mjacob@feral.com on Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 01:22:07PM -0700 References: <20010818220823.C8481@caldera.de> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108181321520.59594-100000@beppo>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 01:22:07PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > The linux schedule_task functions aren't all that lightweight either. > Did you actually take a look? I bet you mean something else. The cost of schedule_task is basically allocation of an 24byte struct and one wakeup. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010818224642.A14857>