From owner-p4-projects Mon Jul 15 9:10: 7 2002 Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 05AD537B401; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B36C37B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0994043E6A for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (perforce@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6FG9pJU055892 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:09:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@freebsd.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g6FG9peO055886 for perforce@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200207151609.g6FG9peO055886@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to chris@freebsd.org using -f From: Chris Costello Subject: PERFORCE change 14278 for review To: Perforce Change Reviews Sender: owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/p4db/chv.cgi?CH=14278 Change 14278 by chris@chris_holly on 2002/07/15 09:09:01 o Move the copyright over to the left one so it doesn't exceed 80 columns. o Turn the sample category and function into an actual MAC Policy Operation description. The introduction to the Access Control Checks section will be written after I figure out what information becomes redundant in each subsection. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/trustedbsd/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/mac/chapter.sgml#2 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/trustedbsd/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/mac/chapter.sgml#2 (text+ko) ==== @@ -1,41 +1,41 @@ - + @@ -78,13 +78,12 @@ which supply policy modules with relevant data on a subject and the operation it is attempting to perform on an object. - - Category + + Access Control Checks - General information regarding this family of mac policy - ops. + ... - + <function>mac_<replaceable>policy</replaceable>_cred_check_debug_proc</function> @@ -125,7 +124,18 @@ - Such and such ... + This policy operation is intended to determine whether a + specified subject process should be debugging a specified + object process. Generally a policy module implementing this + operation would compare the subject label + (cred->cr_label) to the object label + (proc->p_ucred->cr_label) and return + 0 if the subject is allowed to debug the + object, or EACCES if it + cannot. + + Why does BIBA return 'No such process' if the + process is of lower integrity? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message