Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:41:11 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@gmail.com>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/security/gnutls Makefile
Message-ID:  <20050911174110.GB58801@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050911112816.GA755@lame.novel.ru>
References:  <200509091534.j89FY2Qi043829@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050909170934.GA42230@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050910044627.GA761@lame.novel.ru> <20050910052129.GA49500@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050910123802.GA669@lame.novel.ru> <20050910175757.GA52565@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050911112816.GA755@lame.novel.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 03:28:16PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
>  Kris wrote:
>=20
> > > Even if there were, I think it's quite obvious that port which has be=
en
> > > removed from the ports tree should be deinstalled from user's system,=
=20
> > > isn't it? BTW, portupgrade notes when there are such kind of ports in
> > > the system.
> > >=20
> > > I think the proper solution is deinstalling obsolete port (i.e. gnutl=
s-devel
> > > in our case) from the system, but not CONFLICTing with dead ports' gh=
osts.
> > > And Porters Handbook doesn't say we should CONFLICT with nonexistent =
ports.
> > >=20
> > > Am I missing something?
> >=20
> > The point of CONFLICTS is to prevent two ports from spamming each
> > other with the same installed files.  That's exactly what would happen
> > if someone still has gnutls-devel installed (it was only removed a few
> > days ago) and tries to install this one, so it makes perfect sense to
> > me that you should keep it there.
>=20
> Done. But how long should it be kept?

Probably at least one release cycle..it's harmless to keep it there.

Kris



--24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDJGw2Wry0BWjoQKURAtOfAKCI/wdVO1WAm207uV+wpY9qMXdp9wCeL/bq
Grn5kK+974A2QJwvjvbDtww=
=cY8t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050911174110.GB58801>