Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:49:29 +0100 (BST) From: Iain Hibbert <plunky@rya-online.net> To: Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libhci update Message-ID: <1240386569.369073.696.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> In-Reply-To: <bb4a86c70904211651m6127745ao9d4f26c91e428994@mail.gmail.com> References: <E1Lv5La-00058x-HH@smtpbarns01> <bb4a86c70904201053y1a04d76el336432d3e1a23576@mail.gmail.com> <1240311202.361300.1366.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> <bb4a86c70904210959w6de5e808h9f85ee2bb1995dbf@mail.gmail.com> <1240352254.082638.416.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> <bb4a86c70904211651m6127745ao9d4f26c91e428994@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > > In bt_devreq() you used buf[320] is that truly enough? I didn't check that > > part of the radio specification dedicated to baseband packet size but the > > Broadcom BCM2045B device in my laptop claims to have max_acl_size of 1017.. > > yes, but we are not dealing with acl packets in bt_devreq() only > commands and event that have up to 255 bytes of payload. Doh > please see attached revised patch. I've got no more comments here iain
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1240386569.369073.696.nullmailer>