From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 25 10:44:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA23405 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 10:44:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA23398 Mon, 25 Mar 1996 10:44:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0u1HFi-0003wkC; Mon, 25 Mar 96 10:44 PST Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA11722; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 17:00:47 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: Bill Fenner cc: Greg Lehey , jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), pst@shockwave.com, hackers@freebsd.org, bde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kgdb / remote gdb of the kernel? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Mar 1996 09:48:26 PST." <96Mar25.094841pst.177478@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 17:00:46 +0000 Message-ID: <11720.827773246@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Ethernet would be cool, though. NeXTStep does this, (they don't use > IP, just raw ethernet frames), and I could at least figure out what > protocol they use if we care about being compatible. I'd rather have IP, that would allow >really< remote debugging. > Raw ethernet has the advantage of being easier to implement, but the > disadvantage of needing to do your debugging from a box on the same > physical network. Yeah, not much use for me... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.