From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jan 29 15: 1: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D127737B699 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:00:44 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0TN0h391810; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:00:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.2/8.11.1av) with ESMTP id f0TN0b791802; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:00:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010129175758.03255570@marble.sentex.net> X-Sender: mdtancsa@marble.sentex.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:00:36 -0500 To: , From: Mike Tancsa Subject: RE: BIND 8.2.3 upgrade available In-Reply-To: <006901c08a45$30d64860$46010a0a@sysadmininc.com> References: <20010129143300.A38419@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 05:45 PM 1/29/2001 -0500, Peter Brezny wrote: >Is there a big reason why anyone would not want to just go ahead and run >bind 9? I dont think all the features are there yet. At least the last time I looked at it, there were some things unimplemented. Also, the configuration is not totally compatible. I also found it to be a little unpredictable when I tried version 9.0.1. Perhaps its more stable now, but I personally would wait another month or so for it to shake out. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administration, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message