From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 04:57:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC2716A422 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C302F43D45 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:57:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k144tnjN002812; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:55:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:55:49 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> To: scottl@samsco.org From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:55:52 -0700 (MST) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 04:57:10 -0000 From: Scott Long Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:40:42 -0700 > Warner Losh wrote: > > From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) > > Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 > > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100 > > = > > = > >>Kris Kennaway writes: > >> > >>>COPTFLAGS=3D-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs. > >> > >>Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD. > > = > > = > > Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds? It make > > pre-commit testing a big pita. How about just -O on both head and = in > > RELENG_6? The kernel make files have special magic to disable the > > parts of -O2 that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2, > > despite efforts in the past to stop the practice. > > = > > Warner > > = > > = > = > There is value in testing -O2, since enabling that is a good long-ter= m > goal. What might be nice is to run tinderboxes with all default > compiler settings, and then once or twice a week to a special run tha= t > has the more experimental flags. My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags. Warner