From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 23 08:57:50 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E8FF34F
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:57:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x230.google.com (mail-qc0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::230])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FF2D1530
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:57:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id m20so619114qcx.7
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=a2DKAZCK8WU8sdzv2AW9IZ5J+CaRqykY/25n+WZuhiE=;
 b=nVIlTcpKBGcfN1qatQ9I8mlBNTTLhIVTA8nUuAzTADe8uKFBBsKF+x8WVEGN1L2AOY
 iAmcVlQ767DUNVsgNLEpvahgy0C7GhfitZD0GQR86C+Ga77FZHni4TbIuOeLiWJtAKDC
 3hyTE3YFEup5xuknhlm7ROGDGFx91OWJwmVzeLhJvUNzFzOHe5sBU7rMoJYss1zdsqyq
 uNErmXBwyblIZenb2Nj9YdEECz295TgRZf5cqjzs9mxX6Yl6O6u/+cEsmLfa+yQE6lII
 iOx9xgMgOKwduNJ+Ua/mkdhRn4woVqjR7lDEy3Ya3OczX410eZIjP2MkuD9TO+iiHktY
 Um7A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.221.194 with SMTP id id2mr55328602qcb.5.1398243469145;
 Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: benlaurie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.96.162.196 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <10999.1398215531@server1.tristatelogic.com>
References: <20140423010054.2891E143D098@rock.dv.isc.org>
 <10999.1398215531@server1.tristatelogic.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:57:49 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VxdVwA3SNsJ85o5jV5Pu7ToVU4I
Message-ID: <CAG5KPzy6cx8rzz6edeKkjSwYpenXioVd0LEj5tcp+92i00vFbg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL static analysis, was: De Raadt + FBSD + OpenSSH + hole?
From: Ben Laurie <benl@freebsd.org>
To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:57:50 -0000

On 23 April 2014 02:12, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:
>
> In message <20140423010054.2891E143D098@rock.dv.isc.org>,
> Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>
>>As for the number of CLANG analysis warnings.  Clang has false
>>positives
>
> Please define your terms.
>
> I do imagine that the truth or falsehood of your assertion may depend
> quite substantally on what one does or does not consider a "false
> positive" in this context.
>
>>some of which are impossible to remove regardless of how
>>you recode the section...
>
> I, for one, would dearly love to see one or more concrete examples
> which purport to support the above assertion (of which I am dubious).

So try wading through the morass of false positives yourself and
discover what a joy it is for yourself.