From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  3 06:11:27 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB68106566B
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  3 Mar 2008 06:11:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com [209.68.5.17])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1CFE8FC1C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  3 Mar 2008 06:11:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 15909 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2008 06:11:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown)
	by unknown with SMTP; 3 Mar 2008 06:11:25 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 00:11:24 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <200803030435.m234Z7As026508@venus.xmundo.net>
Message-ID: <20080303001004.R37933@odysseus.silby.com>
References: <200803030435.m234Z7As026508@venus.xmundo.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Ephemeral ports patch (fixed)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:11:27 -0000


On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from 1024 to 
> 10000.

Now that I've actually gone to try to apply the patch (so I can view the 
two codepaths side by side, rather than in diff form), I'm finding that I 
can't apply it.  I think all the whitespace got stomped, either by your 
mail program or my mail program.  Can you please resent this as an 
attachment?

-Mike