Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:50:47 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: putting HESIOD, Appletalk and IPX on notice Message-ID: <22301.1123275047@phk.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Aug 2005 16:39:02 EDT." <20050805203901.GA88453@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20050805203901.GA88453@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway writes: >> Cool. I think the standard is "WANT_FOO", but that is a detail. It >> may be an idea to make these default to "off" in releases, but keep >> them in HEAD until they become too painful to care about. That >> would probably handle the CYB factor the best. > >Ports uses WITH_*/WITHOUT_* for user control knobs, and WANT_* is for >internal port use only. I can see a benefit from being orthogonal to ports usage in this, so I think the YES_FOO is actually the right thing. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22301.1123275047>