Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 21:50:59 +0200 From: Nadow <el.nadow@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, lehmann@ans-netz.de Subject: Fwd: Thunar and Xfce-4.4 Message-ID: <bf79ce230609041250k7f41b00djea030b10a67b2cf4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <bf79ce230609041244j7e0480f9t180e8595794a779c@mail.gmail.com> References: <bf79ce230609041044i4477585ay21c52ff602d05a29@mail.gmail.com> <20060904203746.ac81ff81.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <bf79ce230609041244j7e0480f9t180e8595794a779c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2006/9/4, Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>: > > Nadow wrote: > > > Hi! Im new at the list and I would like to know why arent Thunar and > > Xfce-4.4 in the FreeBSD's ports tree. Is there any reason? I would do > the > > ports myself but I am almost newbie at FreeBSD so Im afraid that I dont > know > > how. Anybody can? Thank you. > > There is a patchset for xfce4.4 which is right now being reworked for rc1. > It is not in the tree because xfce 4.4 isn't released yet. > > > -- > Oliver Lehmann > http://www.pofo.de/ > http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ Excuse my ignorance but, Cant be beta or RC versions of programs in the ports tree?. You know, like enlighteenment-0.17 which has been (and It is still) a beta for 5 years and it is in the ports tree as enlightenment-0.16.999.0.2 Thank you for your time
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bf79ce230609041250k7f41b00djea030b10a67b2cf4>