Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:05:04 +0100
From:      Mats Mellstrand <mats@exmandato.se>
To:        Daisuke Aoyama <aoyama@peach.ne.jp>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD/armv6z/clang on Raspberry Pi 512MB (with U-Boot + ubldr)
Message-ID:  <016DDBBF-D502-4C76-96B5-BEE2D46FC6CC@exmandato.se>
In-Reply-To: <E614FD5C-4177-4628-BAB7-9BF4D3A6DF52@exmandato.se>
References:  <B5F827FF91C94FF2AFEE00194A2BB2C5@ad.peach.ne.jp> <B508111FCE534B2CBA61F4D1EC1078D3@ad.peach.ne.jp> <D3ABE3919EA74D668DB060952B5CD8C0@ad.peach.ne.jp> <2659960079254C38ACD2F1DCBB7A1A19@ad.peach.ne.jp> <E48DEAF481F74C69A1BC7A01F2B8E74A@ad.peach.ne.jp> <D867259F89CF44409C2359527D0263D4@ad.peach.ne.jp> <722ED669-A682-4F25-A65B-1E2FF8CFAA4D@exmandato.se> <C46F868CE2644D8AA6F608A41D806128@ad.peach.ne.jp> <DCCE15D5-9AAD-4249-8EBA-29F22B04288F@exmandato.se> <20130131001553.GC67562@cicely7.cicely.de> <9E78813F3BF946A4A2FCEA2C363A847E@ad.peach.ne.jp> <E614FD5C-4177-4628-BAB7-9BF4D3A6DF52@exmandato.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,=20

In trying to install the ports collection on my RPi, the following =
happens:

kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 12582912 total allocated
KDB: enter: panic
[ thread pid 27505 tid 100053 ]
Stopped at      $d:     ldrb    r15, [r15, r15, ror r15]!

Suggestions? (more than not installing the ports collection)

I'm running:

FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r246066M: Thu Jan 31 23:24:06 JST 2013     =
aoyama@fbs.local:/usr/obj-rpi-clang/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI-B-test16  =
arm

/mm


On 31 jan 2013, at 16:17, Mats Mellstrand <mats@exmandato.se> wrote:

> Hi
>=20
> Thanks!=20
>=20
> Your patch works fine!
>=20
> /mm
>=20
> On 31 jan 2013, at 16:07, Daisuke Aoyama <aoyama@peach.ne.jp> wrote:
>=20
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> I found a solution. When disabling hardware check sum offload, it =
works.
>> (# ifconfig ue0 -rxcsum)
>>=20
>> Please check new kernel or apply the patch attached this mail.
>> http://www.peach.ne.jp/archives/rpi/kernel/kernel-20130131.gz
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>> --=20
>> Daisuke Aoyama
>>=20
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Bernd Walter" <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:15 AM
>> To: "Mats Mellstrand" <mats@exmandato.se>
>> Cc: "Daisuke Aoyama" <aoyama@peach.ne.jp>; <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
>> Subject: Re: FreeBSD/armv6z/clang on Raspberry Pi 512MB (with U-Boot =
+ ubldr)
>>=20
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 06:28:12PM +0100, Mats Mellstrand wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> On 30 jan 2013, at 17:28, Daisuke Aoyama <aoyama@peach.ne.jp> =
wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>>> The image works, but I can't get IPv6 to work as expected.
>>>>>> I can ping6 to and from my Raspberry but trying to ssh in to RPIs =
IPv6 address just hangs.
>>>>>> The same happens when I try to ssh out from RPI to a IPv6 =
address.
>>>>>> IPv4 works.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Sorry, I didn't check with ue0.
>>>>> It seems if_smsc is buggy.
>>>>> I'm using axe for testing. It works IPv6.
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> pi@raspberry-pi:~ % w
>>>>>> 4:19PM  up  2:50, 3 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
>>>>>> USER       TTY      FROM                      LOGIN@  IDLE WHAT
>>>>>> root       u0       -                         4:11PM     - -csh =
(csh)
>>>>>> pi         pts/0    172.18.0.20               4:12PM     - _su =
(csh)
>>>>>> pi         pts/1    2001:3e0:6cf:18:20c:29ff  4:19PM     - w
>>>>>> pi@raspberry-pi:~ % ifconfig ue1
>>>>>> ue1: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric =
0 mtu 1500
>>>>>>      options=3D80008<VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE>
>>>>>>      ether 10:6f:3f:66:75:1d
>>>>>>      inet6 fe80::126f:3fff:fe66:751d%ue1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
>>>>>>      inet 172.18.0.99 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 172.18.255.255
>>>>>>      inet6 2001:3e0:6cf:18:126f:3fff:fe66:751d prefixlen 64
>>>>>>      nd6 options=3D21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
>>>>>>      media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>>>>>>      status: active
>>>>>=20
>>>>> If possible, please try other ether device (include wireless LAN).
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks! The interface run0/wlan0  works fine with IPv6
>>>=20
>>> If IPv4 works, then usually multicast hash support is broken in =
driver.
>>> It is hard to debug if you are unaware of the undelying protocol =
details.
>>> Assuming machine B is the one with the brokmen driver.
>>> You can't ping6 from A to B until B sends anything to A.
>>> This way A learns MAC address from B without needing the neighbor
>>> discovery packet (ARP replacement, although ND6 has other purpose as =
well),
>>> which is send via multicast, to be received by machine B.
>>> Putting an interface into promiscuous helps as workaround, because =
then
>>> the interface won't filter anything and all multicast frames are =
received
>>> as well, unless promiscuous support is broken too.
>>> If ping6 works both sides than ssh should do as well, but only if =
you
>>> try before the nd6 entries expire.
>>> A simple ping6 test might look as if it works if you started ping6 =
from
>>> B to A before trying from A to B, so A already has nd6 entry for B.
>>> You can lookup nd6 table by issuing ndp -an command.
>>>=20
>>> Some low level details.
>>> A system has an IPv6 adress configured on it's interface.
>>> It also joins a multicast group for that IP address.
>>> There is a formular to calculate the multicast address from the =
unicast(*)
>>> address.
>>> (*) when I write unicast I also mean link local and anycast as well.
>>> You can lookup all IP addresses including multicast by netstat -ia.
>>> A system, which wants to send an IPv6 packet to an IPv6 address at =
the
>>> same LAN needs the MAC address of the machine, which has the IPv6 =
address
>>> configured.
>>> Unless it has the address in his neighbor address cache already it
>>> sends an inquiry (Neighbor Discovery ND) to the multicast address - =
with
>>> IPv4 it was send via broadcast.
>>> It knows the multicast address by using the same formular from the
>>> targeting unicast address as the host owning that address.
>>> This way the inquiry packet won't disturb every host allowing larger =
LANs.
>>> Some IPv6 unicast addresses share the same multicast, so there are =
some
>>> collisions, but less than with broadcast.
>>> Multicast however also needs to be transfered using target MAC =
addresses.
>>> There is a formular which translates an IPv6 multicast address to an
>>> ethernet MAC address, giving more address collisions.
>>> Network interfaces can't filter countless individual MAC addresses, =
so
>>> there is a filter layer as well, usually containg 64 bits, with each
>>> bit allowing a given set of multicast MAC addresses.
>>> The formular from MAC address to filter bit is hardware dependend,
>>> although most use the plain old NE2000 formular, there are exeptions
>>> with other formular and chips using more bits allowing finer =
filters.
>>> This point is often done wrong in drivers - some forgot to take care
>>> about multicast bits completely, some use the standard NE2000 filter
>>> with hardware using something different, etc...
>>>=20
>>> PS:
>>> In the end there are many collisions, only to be avoided by using
>>> multicast aware switches in large LANs and a few multicast =
addresses.
>>> Therefor also wise to avoid some unicast addresses as they collide
>>> with anyhost or other popular multicast addresses.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> --=20
>>> B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
>>> Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner =
uvm.
>> <smsc.patch>
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?016DDBBF-D502-4C76-96B5-BEE2D46FC6CC>