From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 23 4:14:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A27B1560A; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 04:13:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Is2M-000D43-00; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 13:13:14 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Brian F. Feldman" Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ls(1) options affecting -l long format In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:36:00 +0200." <49041.935400960@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 13:13:14 +0200 Message-ID: <50222.935406794@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:36:00 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > If there are no objections (other than the obvious backward issue of > compatibility) in the next few days, I'll bring Chris's change in (with > a style fix), as well as teaching -o to imply -l. Eeek, I've been confused. Our -o and the OpenGroup spec's -o are completely different. :-) The -n option will imply -l, but -o will be a no-op unless at least one of -n and -l is specified. Manpage changes will be included in the deal. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message