Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 19:11:27 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com>, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, FreeBSD Net <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TSO help or hindrance ? (was Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux) Message-ID: <522FA71F.4000400@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <332980519.21486297.1378854243253.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> References: <332980519.21486297.1378854243253.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/10/2013 7:04 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Mike Tancsa wrote: >> On 9/10/2013 6:42 PM, Barney Cordoba wrote: >>> NFS has been broken since Day 1, so lets not come to conclusions >>> about >>> anything >>> as it relates to NFS. >> >> iSCSI is NFS ? >> > It would be really nice if you could try trasz`s new iSCSI stack and > see how well it works. (I, for one, am hoping it makes it into 10.0, > but it may be too late.) I was only doing limited testing of iSCSI both as target and initiator. I was a little disappointed at the slow speeds I was getting. Noticing the thread about TSO, I thought it would be interesting to test and sure enough it did make a difference. IIRC, the new iSCSI stack is currently tested more for correctness than performance? ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?522FA71F.4000400>