Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:31:30 -0800
From:      Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>, Sidju <lists@sidju.se>
Subject:   Re: nosh init system
Message-ID:  <51AE1F01-1FE4-4ECE-9AAB-7E5625661FF0@cschubert.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1902082212510.10083@puchar.net>
References:  <c8sxY3L8OrRosQ0UdftF6FrqHGRs_uJal0l7YlID7b_xwVG05yeU8DGoS78wo5089zww5pDdvbM_gwCkXxCVjaPYiDS-kNJLxN7b9iGwfxk=@sidju.se> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1902082212510.10083@puchar.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On February 8, 2019 1:13:04 PM PST, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar=2Enet> w=
rote:
>>
>> I might be missing something since I have only been in the group for
>a few months, but is anyone looking at the "nosh" init system (
>https://jdebp=2Eeu/Softwares/nosh/ )?
>>> From what I have read there is some talk of writing a new init
>system; is nosh known to be bad in some way or just obscure (it did
>take me a decent while to find)?
>
>What is wrong in existing init system?
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-hackers@freebsd=2Eorg mailing list
>https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>"freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd=2Eorg"

nosh isn't really mainstream=2E Why not make an port?
--=20
Pardon the typos and autocorrect, small keyboard in use=2E
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy=2ESchubert@cschubert=2Ecom>
FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD=2Eorg> Web: http://www=2EFreeBSD=2Eorg

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few=2E



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51AE1F01-1FE4-4ECE-9AAB-7E5625661FF0>