From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 4 13:00:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891FE16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 May 2004 13:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D1B43D1D for ; Tue, 4 May 2004 13:00:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from DeepCore.dk (sos.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.130]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i44K0Q4l038011; Tue, 4 May 2004 22:00:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <4097F65A.3000709@DeepCore.dk> Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 22:00:26 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040329) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Olzheim References: <007e01c417eb$6691ef90$122aa8c0@skon2> <406C29F9.3070705@DeepCore.dk> <20040504193533.GA92558@stack.nl> <20040504194115.GA67988@stack.nl> <20040504194803.GA94861@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040504194803.GA94861@stack.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.4 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA driver cannot detect the Serial ATA disk in FreeBSD/AMD64-Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 20:00:38 -0000 Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:41:15PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > >>On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:35:33PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: >> >>>This patch still has to be applied to be able to boot on my AMD64... >>> >>>Maybe it should be committed ? >> >>Erhm, nevermind, even _with_ the patch my kernel cannot find its disk >>anymore... > > > Nevermind the blabbering about the patch. It _was_ already committed in > 1.78 and I tried reversing it, which obviously doesn't help... > > So it's a new problem. > > dmesg of a working kernel attached... Hmm, it did work on my semilar amd64 box a few days ago... I'll check when I get it powered up again (its disks has been "stolen" for other purposes here in the lab).. -- -Søren