Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:07:26 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Re: acpi shows wrong battery state (fwd) Message-ID: <201009031507.29477.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C80962F.1080700@icyb.net.ua> References: <20100901042852.P29840@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20100903114418.I32216@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <4C80962F.1080700@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 03 September 2010 02:31 am, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 03/09/2010 06:01 Ian Smith said the following: > > But that's really an aside from the real issue you identify > > below, and perhaps also some TZ value/s being 'absurd' .. > > Let's try to not mix these things together just yet. > acpi_hp/acpi_wmi problems should not affect acpi_ec in any way. > (the converse could be true, but let's not go there yet...) Uh... If I am reading acpi_wmi.c correctly, it installs its own version of EC handler and EC is directly read/written via ACPI_EC_READ() and ACPI_EC_WRITE() from there. Apparently, it just bypasses EC serialization and "affects" EC. Am I reading it wrong? BTW, it is kinda messy way to handle EC. :-( Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201009031507.29477.jkim>