Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 12:05:06 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> To: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <C3FF05D58E5ACEECF4F8946F@cc-126-240.int.t-online.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050922184057.GA97327@heechee.tobez.org> References: <200509220748.j8M7mYMT043867@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050922164036.GA97847@utopia.leeym.com> <20050922184057.GA97327@heechee.tobez.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+-le 22/09/2005 20:40 +0200, Anton Berezin =E9crivait : | On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:40:36AM +0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote: |> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:48:34AM +0000, Anton Berezin wrote: |> > tobez 2005-09-22 07:48:34 UTC |> >=20 |> > FreeBSD ports repository |> >=20 |> > Modified files: |> > databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo=20 |> > Log: |> > Update to 1.15. Require perl from ports. Assign maintainer to perl@. |> > =20 |> > Revision Changes Path |> > 1.7 +7 -11 ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/Makefile |> > 1.3 +2 -2 ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/distinfo |>=20 |> Just curious... |>=20 |> Is it a policy to assign maintainer to perl@ for the ports@ owned p5-* |> ports? |=20 | Not really, it's a matter of personal preference. I did not feel like | having a maintainer lock on some of those ports, but I did not want them | to stay unmaintained, either. There is, I think, a better chance that | someone (myself included) will take care of such when they belong to | perl@ as opposed to ports@. In other words, you want them maintained, but not by you ;-) --=20 Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C3FF05D58E5ACEECF4F8946F>