Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:56:56 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solving the stack gap issue Message-ID: <3D632BA8.45C64D10@mindspring.com> References: <200208171918.aa72556@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <20020818055951.N12475-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <15714.17605.575558.398279@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820153515.GL75574@elvis.mu.org> <20020820184624.GB86074@elvis.mu.org> <3D62D292.D0F3FEE6@mindspring.com> <20020821011201.GC86074@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxime Henrion wrote: > Terry Lambert wrote: > > I thought this was already do-able on a call by call basis? From > > sysent.h: > [ripped code] > > I'm aware of this flag, the subject of this thread was about *removing* > it and let the syscalls acquire Giant on an invidual basis. I think you've misinterpreted. Can't this be done one function at a time *using this flag*? I don't see what the big deal is about, if this can be done incrementally, is all. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D632BA8.45C64D10>