From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 13 9: 1:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from squall.waterspout.com (squall.waterspout.com [208.13.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C746437B50E for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:01:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by squall.waterspout.com (Postfix, from userid 1050) id B034A9B73; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:59:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:59:15 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Ted Wisniewski Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports changes Message-ID: <20011213115915.M30626@squall.waterspout.com> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Ted Wisniewski , ports@freebsd.org References: <3C18B754.5FC8F396@wiz.plymouth.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C18B754.5FC8F396@wiz.plymouth.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:12:36AM -0500, Ted Wisniewski wrote: > Just a heads up... The ports changes page does not reflect any changes > in the ports tree > over the last few weeks. I know there have been additions (as seen via > cvsup). If help > is needed in this area, I could help out. I would just need to know how > you would like > me to help. I'm not sure on the urgency of this issue. FreshPorts (http://www.freshports.org/) seems to do a better job. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message