Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:00:00 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com>
Cc:        Nguyen Tam Chinh <unixvn@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files
Message-ID:  <20070701205906.G64506@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <b41c75520707011154v495925f6u20f6b0f915d45125@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <64b284310706270311j2a6af2f6i6766b483a4b66a5c@mail.gmail.com>  <b41c75520707010030u25497199p1ce6b91bd1f5287c@mail.gmail.com>  <20070701202709.L64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <b41c75520707011154v495925f6u20f6b0f915d45125@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>> > snapshot of a partition, in order to perform a background-fsck and
>> > thus our website was down. So ufs2 does not scale well.
>
> Reasons not related to the nfs-server itself. FreeBSD itself was
> rock-solid. It was firmware-related on the storage-side.
>
i always use software mirror concat or both in FreeBSD. always works, 10 
times cheaper, fully portable and (yes true) comparable in speed. in some 
cases - faster.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070701205906.G64506>