From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Nov 3 6:49:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moriarity.grauel.com (moriarity.grauel.com [199.233.104.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB7D37B4CF for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 06:49:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rjk@localhost) by moriarity.grauel.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eA3EnUO04642; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:49:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rjk) From: Richard J Kuhns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14850.53370.406348.853664@moriarity.grauel.com> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:49:30 -0500 (EST) To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: A 4.1.1 --> 4.2-BETA upgrade problem X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 11) "Carlsbad Caverns" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After building and installing a new world and kernel, I ran mergemaster to update /etc &co. One of the files it installed was the new pam.conf, which caused rsh to stop functioning since it included the line rshd auth required pam_deny.so I changed `required' back to `sufficient', and rsh worked again. Looking at the cvs log, I see that PAM support has been removed from rshd and rlogind on -current. Is that a planned MFC, or are rshd and rlogind intended to be disabled? If disabling rshd was discussed on -stable, I must have missed it. I have a tendency to just slide past bikeshed discussions as long as I can work around the final decision if I don't agree with it :-). It really should be mentioned in UPDATING, though. -- Richard Kuhns rjk@grauel.com PO Box 6249 Tel: (765)477-6000 \ 100 Sawmill Road x319 Lafayette, IN 47903 (800)489-4891 / To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message