From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 16 12:16:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AF1106566B for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610598FC29 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so5402640bwz.13 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:16:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sHzODm4Ti3gjaG5ROCHdER54CWmnHM97DarWEdJuTDE=; b=FBJkcKCBQHx3AFXKYHjV4TFHgxCgjGyaS/T0mgTikFxOe6sFctPXZ1VRc/3bLF7u38 Vv5FWK22eeMnbrK84laRFgPRJPDZKugE9EvUBaaKrqo8sfK3R6KezzBvFG2/+gK3lUH8 /NCy8BA4cOI81/GsM33QVNGNA4c0pW6DZ2SZU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=HJg7LPo0yIHildyCSph2S6cth4uDLEyEQ6jDKzk1Hyp9qAgAx+zmt0zKcyGB/d6NSz ZLXvEmPzwByI63gYGWxDZIx3Ttv/mnE8SU94Qbu/8059BoGeHJWwemyXd96qgEYGUutC zwpi8/bYBhaib7JLxdTk3EK6DocSt1DYbj2xs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.16.140 with SMTP id o12mr2558584bka.125.1305548214101; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.65.198 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.65.198 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:16:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110516080207.7ef48549@seibercom.net> References: <20110516080207.7ef48549@seibercom.net> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:16:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Clean up old PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:16:56 -0000 On 16 May 2011 13:03, "Jerry" wrote: > > There are several PRs that are years (literally) old. For example: > > > o 2005/10/13 ports/87397 edwin [patch] incorrect use of PAPERSIZE make variable in some ports > > Maybe it is time that some of these extremely old PRs be put to rest. > Perhaps a new classification should be added. Presently there are > several possible classifications: > > o - open > A problem report has been submitted, no sanity checking performed. > a - analyzed > The problem is understood and a solution is being sought. > f - feedback > Further work requires additional information from the originator or > the community - possibly confirmation of the effectiveness of a > proposed solution. > p - patched > A patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or > confirmation from originator) are still open. > r - repocopy > The resolution of the problem report is dependent on a repocopy > operation within the CVS repository which is awaiting completion. > s - suspended > The problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information or > resources. This is a prime candidate for somebody who is looking > for a project to do. If the problem cannot be solved at all, it > will be closed, rather than suspended. > c - closed > A problem report is closed when any changes have been integrated, > documented, and tested -- or when fixing the problem is abandoned. > > I am proposing a new one: > > x - expired > This report is over 2 years old. If no one has bothered to fix it > by now, then in all probability no one will. > Normally closed is used for this. Chris