From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 8 05:28:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E2416A423 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 05:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D0043D45 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 05:28:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l8so527261nzf for ; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 22:28:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=scdRxzwUxBL2VEPiCHiJ1AJLR2fFwmQOD2Y4dz0NfhhJsr2nNmVMHqWLUA+pHWVM5mSavo6Ke53GTN2/1hQM0vu16DAQPS0mvq/Oy0iifpYro4P51AHtsYLWbQOablF3ZRWkQ8U5s1YAf1BP49VlhgoWkhkLJqwZ38Ijwevysp8= Received: by 10.37.15.33 with SMTP id s33mr1723631nzi; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 22:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.57.15 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 22:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6eb82e0604072228o601b44e2n2d8a718d0b33664f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 01:28:55 -0400 From: "Rong-En Fan" To: "Jun Kuriyama" In-Reply-To: <7mveururc6.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <7mveururc6.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpc.lockd brokenness (2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 05:28:57 -0000 On 3/6/06, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > I'm not yet received enough information to track rpc.lockd problem. > > As Kris posted before, here is a patch to backout my suspected > commit. If someone can easily reproduce this problem, please try with > this patch on both of server/client side of rpc.lockd (I'm not sure > which of server/client side this affects). > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/80389 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/84953 > > Any reports about this patch (OK or still problem) are welcome! Hi, Somehow I have problems with lockd after 3 boxes upgraded from Feb's RELENG_6 to Apr 6's. One of them has problems with lockd. For example, mutt and irssi will stuck in lockd (shown by top). I tried to back out changes in revision 1.18 for lock_proc.c, and do /etc/rc.d/nfslocking stop then a start. After backout it, mutt and irssi work well. If I put 1.18 back, mutt and irssi will stuck in lockd again. Last month, I played with the test program/script in those two PRs, found that revision 1.18 does not make any difference. I'm not 100% sure the problem I encountered now is related to rev 1.18. But it is a report that backout 1.18 really helps. For record, all my clients involved in this mail are running RELENG_6. Server is RELENG_5 as of March 9. Only IPv4 here, no IPv6. Regards, Rong-En Fan