From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May  7 23:23:58 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D399516A454;
	Sun,  7 May 2006 23:23:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCCC43DB2;
	Sun,  7 May 2006 23:23:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDF51A3C1A;
	Sun,  7 May 2006 16:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B8B1B516B8; Sun,  7 May 2006 19:23:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:23:31 -0400
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20060507232331.GB7670@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20060506150622.C17611@fledge.watson.org>
	<20060507214153.GA5275@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20060507230430.GA6872@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<200605080722.06435.davidxu@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200605080722.06435.davidxu@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org,
	performance@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain
	sockets)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 23:23:59 -0000


--St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:22:06AM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> On Monday 08 May 2006 07:04, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> > i.e. apparently not a large difference, but still a large proportion
> > of cases where multiple CPUs are woken at once on the same chain.
> >
> > Kris
> This becauses there is no sleepable mutex available, so I had to use
> msleep and wakeup, this is suboptimal, I may put flag MTX_QUIET there
> to let WITNESS shut up.

Can you use wakeup_one()?

Kris


--St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEXoFzWry0BWjoQKURAgVVAJ9oD9FK+zYc12YEJzOZfAN8MmzapwCgttR9
VeRXaBbj3eWlKdlBegnB0HE=
=o3CD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13--