Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:19:52 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] fadvise(2) system call
Message-ID:  <B8639E15-A66F-45DA-A6AA-195349EAE412@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111104160319.GD6110@elvis.mu.org>
References:  <201110281426.00013.jhb@freebsd.org> <201111011308.05204.jhb@freebsd.org> <4EB08740.8010601@cran.org.uk> <201111021136.12629.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111102202015.GQ6110@elvis.mu.org> <4EB2C9DD.9090606@FreeBSD.org> <20111104160319.GD6110@elvis.mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 4, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> * John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> [111103 19:38] wrote:
>> On 11/2/11 1:20 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> * John Baldwin<jhb@freebsd.org>  [111102 11:05] wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 7:56:48 pm Bruce Cran wrote:
>>>>> On 01/11/2011 17:08, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>>>> I had found it via the web: http://linux.die.net/man/2/fadvise
>>>>>> However, after further searching it appears to be stale (if you =
follow
>>>>>> it's cross-reference to madvise(2), that page only has links to
>>>>>> posix_fadvise() and not fadvise()).
>>>>>=20
>>>>> There's
>>>>> http://www.speedware.com/HPe3000_resources/MPE_to_HP-UX_cross-
>>>> =
reference/system_administration_cross-reference/cmd.html?cmdid=3DMS_1800
>>>>> for HP-UX ("*fadvise()* was derived by HP from the IEEE POSIX
>>>>> 1003.1-2001 Standard"), though it also has posix_fadvise.
>>>>=20
>>>> Hmm, that one actually has an extra argument.  I'll just go with
>>>> posix_fadvise() for now.  Interesting that HP lets you OR together
>>>> two policies (so you can say both "I will access this file =
sequentially
>>>> and with noreuse").
>>>=20
>>> Makes sense for gzip/tar.
>>=20
>> Ehh, quite possibly not for something that generic.  I think you only
>> want to do this if you have very specific knowledge about your access
>> pattern, and I do not think they are generically applicable.
>=20
> You often spend time untarring the same tarball over and over=20
> in your workflow John?

This is starting to sound like something that libarchive / pkg_install =
would benefit from (jkh pkg_install or pkgng).
-Garrett=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B8639E15-A66F-45DA-A6AA-195349EAE412>