Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:44:23 +0900 From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: amarkelov@futures.msk.ru Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAO or CURRENT/STABLE/RELEASE Message-ID: <20010112004423N.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53194758477.20010111163908@futures.msk.ru> References: <53194758477.20010111163908@futures.msk.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> is there any great differences between PAO3 and > 3-STABLE/CURRENT/RELEASE ? I want to install FreeBSD on my ThinkPad > 760ED and want to choose one. As I saw at PAO home, they want to add > all APM changes in CURRENT cvs tree. Is it already there? > > Please help what version is better for notebook. As far as I can tell, most of APM code were merged from PAO3 into CURRENT, RELENG_4 and RELENG_3 already. Also most of PAO active developers became committer and PAO3 development is going to end. So I'd recommend you to choose RELENG_4 or CURRENT, not PAO3, and report any problems to improve plain FreeBSD. Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010112004423N.iwasaki>