From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 11:25:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 4CF7E1065672; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:25:34 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: <20110814112534.GA58077@freebsd.org> References: <20110812171611.GA88850@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:48:51 +0000 Cc: Roland Smith , Olivier Smedts , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Hartmann, O." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:25:34 -0000 On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: > >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz > >>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the > >>> permissions et cetera OK? > >>> > >>> Roland > >> > >> No, it does not. > >> > >> What I did so far over night: > >> > >> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. > >> Again failure. > >> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). > >> Everything seems > >> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a > >> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports > >> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very > >> same failure: > >> > >> (portsnap fetch extract:) > >> /usr/ports/devel/cccc/ > >> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/ > >> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/ > >> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/ > >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not > >> found -- snapshot corrupt. > > > > I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated > > by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a > > file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO > > > > 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?) > > 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto) > > 3) tar (ditto) > > > > When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with > > tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz' > > in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an > > 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug! > > > > Roland > > Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current > virtual machine, built with clang. same here: /usr/ports/databases/gigabase/ /usr/ports/databases/godis/ files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang. > Regards! > -- > Niclas