From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 21 1:13:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 2711.dynacom.net (2711.dynacom.net [206.107.213.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BBC37B6AC for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 01:13:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: from urx.com (dsl1-160.dynacom.net [206.159.132.160]) by 2711.dynacom.net (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA01393; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 01:13:46 -0700 Message-ID: <39780647.10DBCA85@urx.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 01:13:59 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gabriel Ambuehl Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSup server loads (was: Stable broken) References: <3976A60C.BE9DE986@urx.com> <20000720095625.A91025@hdroam.ssd.loral.com> <3977334E.AE1F303F@urx.com> <200007202101.OAA17106@vashon.polstra.com> <39777C0E.C44DC92F@urx.com> <7223761166.20000721003801@buz.ch> <39778C79.FDA0662E@urx.com> <12457756279.20000721100436@buz.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > > Hello Kent, > > Friday, July 21, 2000, 1:34:17 AM, you wrote: > > cvsup of source requires around 4-5 minutes for me. There have been > > times when a RELENG_4 src-all via 768Kbs a DSL connection required > > just as long as it did when I was using my 56kb modem. When it is the > > disk, the connection speed doesn't matter much. > > Hmm. I don't think the disk is the limiting factor here. I think it > really is the current load on the cvsup servers. I was only adding a comment that one of the mirror owners made. The checking of the MD5 signature was supposed to be the limiting factor. The mirrors have a limited amount of resources to do the calculations on their end and each connection adds a load. That seemed to be what consumed the resources. When cvsup7 was loaded (~20 users), a cvsup required 20 minutes or so. When it was really lightly loaded, I could cvsup 4-stable in 90 seconds. > > >> Local box is a K6-2 450 acting merely as NAT gateway (and development box, > >> of course, but during cvsup, make world doesn't make much sense ;-). > > I can't imagine doing a build while you are cvsuping. That would be a > > good way to get a mixture of code that doesn't work. > > ACK. > > > Everything seems to be running just fine. If there is something wrong, > > I haven't noticed it. > > I can only agree. But in the last months, IF make world and make > buildkernel ran through, they worked. I never encountered a situation, > where the build was successful but I ended up with a broken system... The only thing I haven't been willing to do is an installworld (make world or etc) before I build my kernel. When the buildworld failed for me, it also failed at the same place for a number of other people. So far, I haven't had a kernel fail to build. Regards, Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ Bomber dropping fire retardant in front of Hanford Wild fire. http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/bomber.jpg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message