From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 8 6:24: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from culverk.student.umd.edu (culverk.student.umd.edu [129.2.196.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F5214F1A for ; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 06:24:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from culverk@wam.umd.edu) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by culverk.student.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA13389; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 09:21:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from culverk@wam.umd.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: culverk.student.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 09:21:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Culver X-Sender: culverk@culverk.student.umd.edu To: Huidae Cho Cc: jim@blues.ghis.net, yurtesen@ispro.net.tr, flygt@sr.se, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux is better than FreeBSD on X? In-Reply-To: <199909081307.WAA09256@unix.kyungpook.ac.kr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > use linux! it's solution. > Not really, it's more like a workaround. Linux is by no means a solution to crappy hardware. Especially since you can just use the linux X server under FreeBSD's Linux emu. FreeBSD's Linux emulation ran the RedHat i740 Xserver for me for about 2 months without a problem. (Before 3.3.4 came out that is.) So I would suggest just using that, and then when the next XFree86 comes out, you'll be set. Also, I think the latest XFree86 4.0 snapshot supports your card. Kenneth Culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message