From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 24 13:26:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB71B16A4BF; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 13:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0058943FBD; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 13:26:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7OKQGQX001892; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 13:26:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7OKQFQZ001891; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 13:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 13:26:15 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: "Jin Guojun [NCS]" , "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Message-ID: <20030824202615.GB1576@dragon.nuxi.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , "Jin Guojun [NCS]" , Greg 'groggy' Lehey , FreeBSD Hackers , FreeBSD hardware Users References: <20030816102051.GB820@wantadilla.lemis.com> <3F3EC949.4759F1A8@lbl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F3EC949.4759F1A8@lbl.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: FreeBSD Hackers cc: FreeBSD hardware Users Subject: Re: nVIDIA nForece2, again X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Hackers , FreeBSD hardware Users List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 20:26:18 -0000 On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 05:16:09PM -0700, Jin Guojun [NCS] wrote: > It is a vague problem on term of best performance -- what. > NVidia has better memory bandwidth in AMD motherboards. s/better/best/ > In terms of IDE performance, the AMD 760MP has > the best performance in all chipsets in the world. 760 gives true > 200 MB/s I/O IDE throughput, where most other chipsets only gives > 100/133 MB/s on both IDE buses with 4 drives. Acutally the nForce chip is based on the AMD 760 chipset. :-) > > My main machine has just fried a southbridge, and I'm looking for a > > replacement. From what I can see, in the AMD range, the current best > > performer is the nVIDIA nForece2. I've read Bill Paul's description > > of the problems with the onboard NIC, and if I buy one of these > > boards, I'll certainly swell his mailbox of disgruntled nVIDIA > > customers. The best nForce2 board is the Asus A7N8X Deluxe (rev 2.0 board). (note this isn't the "-X" board, which is stripped down). http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/socketa/a7n8x-d/overview.HTM Just one nice thing about this board is it has 2 NIC's. The nVidia proprity one, and an normal 3Com xl(4) one. > > I've heard that it has an IOAPIC on it, even for single processors. This is true for any nForce (original, 2, or 3) based board. You can probably even run an SMP kernel on it. > > Based on what I've read, I'd probably be putting a Barton 2600XP+ and > > 0.5 to 1 GB of DDR memory into it. Don't forget to install DIMM's in pairs. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)