Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:56:43 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Andrew Sinclair <syncman@optusnet.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade system destruction? Message-ID: <20050104205643.GC13991@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <41DABE72.2000501@optusnet.com.au> References: <41DA0AB8.3080400@centtech.com> <41DABE72.2000501@optusnet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:04:02PM +0000, Andrew Sinclair wrote: > Portupgrade makes a mess at the best of times. A recursive portupgrade=20 > is not so clever about dependencies, particually on a live system. On=20 > occasion, it even seems to tamper with core libraries which is what=20 > would have occured in your case. Can you provide some evidence of these claims? I'm suspicious :-) Kris --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2wMLWry0BWjoQKURAo3oAJ9fLJlUGLa2+Dwly3iqsb3n3r++cQCfc0U9 gsLUXIxPO9P++hQv8av4sWI= =B68+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050104205643.GC13991>