Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Apr 2006 02:06:34 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Rong-En Fan <grafan@gmail.com>
Cc:        Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rpc.lockd brokenness (2)
Message-ID:  <20060408060634.GA4187@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0604072228o601b44e2n2d8a718d0b33664f@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <7mveururc6.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> <6eb82e0604072228o601b44e2n2d8a718d0b33664f@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 01:28:55AM -0400, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> On 3/6/06, Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not yet received enough information to track rpc.lockd problem.
> >
> > As Kris posted before, here is a patch to backout my suspected
> > commit.  If someone can easily reproduce this problem, please try with
> > this patch on both of server/client side of rpc.lockd (I'm not sure
> > which of server/client side this affects).
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/80389
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/84953
> >
> > Any reports about this patch (OK or still problem) are welcome!
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> Somehow I have problems with lockd after 3 boxes upgraded from
> Feb's RELENG_6 to Apr 6's. One of them has problems with lockd.
> For example, mutt and irssi will stuck in lockd (shown by
> top). I tried to back out changes in revision 1.18 for lock_proc.c,
> and do /etc/rc.d/nfslocking stop then a start. After backout it,
> mutt and irssi work well. If I put 1.18 back, mutt and irssi will stuck
> in lockd again.
>=20
> Last month, I played with the test program/script in those two PRs,
> found that revision 1.18 does not make any difference. I'm not 100%
> sure the problem I encountered now is related to rev 1.18. But
> it is a report that  backout 1.18 really helps.
>=20
> For record, all my clients involved in this mail are running RELENG_6.
> Server is RELENG_5 as of March 9. Only IPv4 here, no IPv6.

1.18 was merged 15 months ago, so it cannot be the cause if you
updated from Feb 2006.

Kris

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEN1LpWry0BWjoQKURAqpiAKD0+UukIZQnJYG8BtwSKtUCb974ggCg8WIu
YTPNRu38kePjgpWJOzpwH5Y=
=058Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060408060634.GA4187>