Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:14:13 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Print +REQUIRED_BY as tree? Message-ID: <110864072.20110912231413@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <4E6E518D.6050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <503309410.20110912205856@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4E6E518D.6050702@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Matthew. You wrote 12 =F1=E5=ED=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 22:38:05: > On 12/09/2011 17:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >> Hello, Ports. >>=20 >> Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports >> from "required" port to "users"? pkg_tree performs opposite task. >>=20 >> +REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately. >>=20 >> I need to investigate exact path why this port is installed on my >> system :) >>=20 > ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex can do this: > lucid-nonsense:/usr/ports:% portdepends -s ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex > [......] p5-FreeBSD-Portindex-2.4 (ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex) > [...BR.] - p5-BerkeleyDB-0.49 (databases/p5-BerkeleyDB) > [...BRL] - - db48-4.8.30.0 (databases/db48) > [EP.BR.] - - perl-5.12.4_2 (lang/perl5.12) > [EP.BR.] - perl-5.12.4_2 (lang/perl5.12) It seems, that your tool works by INDEX or ports database (not installed ports! They could differ, if installed ports are out-of-date!) and it shows exactly the same output as pkg_tree: opposite to what I need. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?110864072.20110912231413>